Could data collection be the Biden administration’s key to successful education?
The thought might elicit a collective groan from educators left bruised by the era of “weaponized� standardized testing ushered in by the 2002 No Child Left Behind Act, acknowledges Jeffrey Henig . But, asserts Henig, Professor of Political Science & Education, “a revamped approach to data collection could help restore and re-energize a community focus on public education — and also help the incoming Biden administration avoid a bruising partisan battle.�
Jeffrey Henig, Professor of Political Science & Education (Photo: TC Archives)
Henig applauds the Biden education agenda, which could include “massive increases in federal funding for disadvantaged students, universal prekindergarten and tuition-free public colleges and universities for middle- and lower-income families.� But to realize those goals, he argues, the Biden administration should fund and incentivize “the “bottom-up use� of data in order to remove “ideological barriers to collaboration� and speak to “Republicans’ belief that innovation and creativity take place locally.�
Information on its own won’t stimulate needed structural changes. It needs to be accompanied by resources, a strategy for shifting power relationships, and a patient investment in sustainable initiatives.
—Jeffrey Henig, Professor of Political Science & Education
As a model for what he’s proposing, Henig cites the Urban Institute’s Data Walks, in which low-income communities have helped craft sexual-health-and-safety curricula for youths and adults and improved employment and education services.
“Information on its own won’t stimulate needed structural changes,� Henig concludes. “It needs to be accompanied by resources, a strategy for shifting power relationships, and a patient investment in sustainable initiatives.� But “done well and wisely,� better use of data could “broaden and fortify a grassroots constituency to support the values the Biden administration hopes to bring to the fore.�